“Interim” Isn’t a Nasty Word

Posted on June 11, 2008. Filed under: interim management | Tags: , , , |

Unfortunately, in the U.S. there is a certain minority of executives and investors who believe that when a company engages with an “interim manager” it is a sign of trouble for the company. This is odd thinking considering their reaction should be one of admiration that the company is shrewd enough to fill gaps with interim leadership before the gaps start dragging down the company’s performance.

I think the negative perception stems from the belief that interims are only used in emergency turnaround situations. We’re all too familiar with the corporate announcement of an interim-CEO or interim-CFO that usually portends a serious management issue. The logic goes that where there’s smoke there’s fire.

Yes, some interims specialize in turnaround situations. Yes, that can be a signal that not all is well in the executive suite. However, the vast majority of interim assignments, especially in Marketing or Sales, are not in turnaround situations (thus far, I’ve never had an engagement in a turnaround). The presence of interim leadership is not an indication that a company is experiencing difficulties. It simply means that the company knew it had a temporary gap in leadership, skills, or resource bandwidth and elected to fill that gap with an on-demand leader.

“Interim” isn’t a nasty word, or a signal that there’s trouble in the castle. There are thousands of interims at work in the U.S. and I assure you they’re not all at work in turnaround or at-risk companies.

Advertisements

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

2 Responses to ““Interim” Isn’t a Nasty Word”

RSS Feed for One Riot – One Ranger Comments RSS Feed

I like this post. Executive Interims are flexible, cost effective, non-political and focussed on delivery. It’s something that senior managers in currently re-structuring organisations find difficult to do because they have a vested interest in the outcomes. Executive Interims are there to deliver and move on with a “successful” recommendation on their CV.

Thank you for your comment, Adam. Interims are a logical choice when restructuring requires tough objectivity. The point I was eager to make in the original post was that there is a solid business case for using interims in any company faced with gaps in skill set and resources, but hesitant to take on full time employees.


Where's The Comment Form?

    About

    A Discussion of Interim Management for Marketing and Sales Functions by Charles Besondy

    RSS

    Subscribe Via RSS

    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com
    • Subscribe in Google Reader
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • The latest comments to all posts in RSS

    Meta

  • About this Blog

    This blog is devoted to the topic of interim management for marketing functions within large and small corporations. Interim management as a staffing concept is well-understood and widely utilized in Europe. However, here in the colonies we are just beginning to open our eyes to the business benefits of being flexible and nimble when it comes to staffing senior-level marketers. (c) 2006 - 2012 Charles Besondy
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • June 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « May   Jul »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30  

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: